Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation detection coverage of" » "whose computational detection coverage of" (Expand search), "whose imputation detection coverage of" (Expand search), "whose mutation detection coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation election coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation directional coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation vegetation coverage of" (Expand search), "pose computation detection coverage of" (Expand search), "these computations detection coverage of" (Expand search), "the computation detection coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation detection coverage of\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation detection coverage of ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation detection coverage of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.