Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation crop coverage on" » "pose computation crop coverage on" (Expand search), "these computations crop coverage on" (Expand search), "the computation crop coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation from coverage on" (Expand search), "whose competition crop coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation co coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation crown coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation drops coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation cusp coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation crop coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation crop coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation crop coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation crop coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation crop coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation crop coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.