Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation code coverage and" » "pose computation code coverage and" (Expand search), "these computations code coverage and" (Expand search), "the computation code coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational code coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computation model coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computation co coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computation care coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computation and coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computation the coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computation code coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation code coverage of" (Expand search)
"using in python python programming" » "using in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using in piton python programming" (Expand search), "using in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using _ python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation code coverage and\") OR (\"using in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation code coverage and ) OR ( using in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation code coverage and") OR ("using in python python programming"))*.