Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation based coverage in" » "pose computation based coverage in" (Expand search), "these computations based coverage in" (Expand search), "the computation based coverage in" (Expand search), "whose competition based coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computacion base coverage in" (Expand search), "whose imputation based coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation based beverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation based beverages in" (Expand search), "whose computation and coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation based coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation based coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation based coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation based coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.