Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose complication in coverage of" » "phase complication in coverage of" (Expand search), "the complication in coverage of" (Expand search), "cause complication in coverage of" (Expand search), "whose complications in coverage of" (Expand search), "whose complication of coverage of" (Expand search), "whose implication in coverage of" (Expand search), "whose complication and coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose complication in coverage of\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose complication in coverage of ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose complication in coverage of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.