Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"valued optimization using reactive programming" » "valued optimization using objective programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization using teaching programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization using declarative programming" (Expand search), "value optimization using reactive programming" (Expand search), "based optimization using reactive programming" (Expand search), "fluid optimization using reactive programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization and reactive programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization using reductive programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization during reactive programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization using active programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"valued optimization using reactive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( valued optimization using reactive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("valued optimization using reactive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.