Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using reactance in routine programming" » "using reactance in reactive programming" (Expand search), "using reactance in cone programming" (Expand search), "using reactance in line programming" (Expand search), "using refractance in routine programming" (Expand search), "using reflectance in routine programming" (Expand search), "using resonance in routine programming" (Expand search), "using reactance and routine programming" (Expand search), "using resistance in routine programming" (Expand search), "using reactance _ routine programming" (Expand search), "using reactance of routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using reactance in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using reactance in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using reactance in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.