Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using metacognition _ computational code" » "in metacognition _ computational code" (Expand search), "reading metacognition _ computational code" (Expand search), "and metacognition _ computational code" (Expand search), "using metacognition _ computational model" (Expand search), "using metacognition _ computational cost" (Expand search), "using metacognition _ computational models" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using metacognition _ computational code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using metacognition _ computational code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using metacognition _ computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.