Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using logic discourse complexity from" » "using logic discursive complexity from" (Expand search), "using logic disclosure complexity from" (Expand search), "using logic discourse community from" (Expand search), "using dialogic discourse complexity from" (Expand search), "using poetic discourse complexity from" (Expand search), "using ironic discourse complexity from" (Expand search), "using log discourse complexity from" (Expand search), "using logistic discourse complexity from" (Expand search), "using reologic discourse complexity from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using logic discourse complexity from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using logic discourse complexity from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using logic discourse complexity from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.