Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using functions in conductive programming" » "using functions in inductive programming" (Expand search), "using functions in collective programming" (Expand search), "using functions in objective programming" (Expand search), "using functional in conductive programming" (Expand search), "ing functions in conductive programming" (Expand search), "testing functions in conductive programming" (Expand search), "using functions and conductive programming" (Expand search), "using functions of conductive programming" (Expand search), "using functions in conducting programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using functions in conductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using functions in conductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using functions in conductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.