Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using functionalized and relative programming" » "on functionalized and relative programming" (Expand search), "acid functionalized and relative programming" (Expand search), "using functional and relative programming" (Expand search), "using functionalized and reactive programming" (Expand search), "using functionalized and reactive programing" (Expand search), "using functionalized and declarative programming" (Expand search), "using functionalized n relative programming" (Expand search), "using functionalized in relative programming" (Expand search), "using functionalized gold relative programming" (Expand search), "using functionalized and related programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using functionalized and relative programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using functionalized and relative programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using functionalized and relative programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.