Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using function code coverage in" » "using functional code coverage in" (Expand search), "using friction code coverage in" (Expand search), "guiding function code coverage in" (Expand search), "using function model coverage in" (Expand search), "using function models coverage in" (Expand search), "using function cross coverage in" (Expand search), "using function care coverage in" (Expand search), "using function and coverage in" (Expand search), "using function the coverage in" (Expand search), "using function code coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using function code coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using function code coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using function code coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.