Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using decomposition in code programming" » "during decomposition in code programming" (Expand search), "gini decomposition in code programming" (Expand search), "building decomposition in code programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition and code programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition of code programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition in cone programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition in core programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition in co programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using decomposition in code programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using decomposition in code programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using decomposition in code programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.