Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational visuality functions data" » "using computacional visual functions data" (Expand search), "using computational visualization functions data" (Expand search), "using computational personality functions data" (Expand search), "and computational visuality functions data" (Expand search), "using computational visual functions data" (Expand search), "using computational quality functions data" (Expand search), "using computational quality function data" (Expand search), "using computational visuality functional data" (Expand search), "using computational visuality functions at" (Expand search), "using computational visuality functions and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational visuality functions data\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational visuality functions data ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computational visuality functions data") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.