Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational direct active programming" » "using computational effect active programming" (Expand search), "using computacional direta active programming" (Expand search), "using computational aspects active programming" (Expand search), "and computational direct active programming" (Expand search), "using computational direct reactive programming" (Expand search), "using computational direct octave programming" (Expand search), "using computational direct adaptive programming" (Expand search), "using computational direct action programming" (Expand search), "using computational direct acting programming" (Expand search), "using computational direct additive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational direct active programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational direct active programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computational direct active programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.