Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational cost fragment programming" » "using computational cost agent programming" (Expand search), "using computational cost driven programming" (Expand search), "using computational cost training programming" (Expand search), "and computational cost fragment programming" (Expand search), "using computational and fragment programming" (Expand search), "using computational design fragment programming" (Expand search), "using computational vision fragment programming" (Expand search), "using computational coat fragments programming" (Expand search), "using computational root fragment programming" (Expand search), "using computational costa fragmentos programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational cost fragment programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational cost fragment programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computational cost fragment programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.