Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computation in generalized progress" » "using computation in generalized progressive" (Expand search), "using computation in generalized procrustes" (Expand search), "using computation in generalized processes" (Expand search), "using computational in generalized progress" (Expand search), "using imputation in generalized progress" (Expand search), "using compilation in generalized progress" (Expand search), "using computation and generalized progress" (Expand search), "using computation of generalized progress" (Expand search), "using computation _ generalized progress" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computation in generalized progress\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computation in generalized progress ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computation in generalized progress") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.