Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computation in active programming" » "using computation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "using computation in octave programming" (Expand search), "using computation in adaptive programming" (Expand search), "using computational in active programming" (Expand search), "using imputation in active programming" (Expand search), "using compilation in active programming" (Expand search), "using computation and active programming" (Expand search), "using computation of active programming" (Expand search), "using computation an active programming" (Expand search), "using computation in action programming" (Expand search)
"using in python python programming" » "using in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using in piton python programming" (Expand search), "using in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using _ python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computation in active programming\") OR (\"using in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computation in active programming ) OR ( using in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computation in active programming") OR ("using in python python programming"))*.