Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using augmentation path computation code" » "using argumentation path computation code" (Expand search), "using segmentation path computation code" (Expand search), "using augmentative path computation code" (Expand search), "using augmentation with computation code" (Expand search), "using augmentation and computation code" (Expand search), "using augmentation to computation code" (Expand search), "using augmentation the computation code" (Expand search), "using augmentation fast computation code" (Expand search), "using augmentation path computational code" (Expand search), "using augmentation path computation model" (Expand search), "using augmentation path computation co" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using augmentation path computation code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using augmentation path computation code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using augmentation path computation code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.