Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"testing computation in grid programming" » "testing imputation in grid programming" (Expand search), "testing population in grid programming" (Expand search), "testing mutation in grid programming" (Expand search), "testing computation in period programming" (Expand search), "testing computation in child programming" (Expand search), "testing computation in goal programming" (Expand search), "testing computation and grid programming" (Expand search), "testing computation of grid programming" (Expand search), "testing computation on grid programming" (Expand search), "testing computation in grain programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("testing computation in grid programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"testing computation in grid programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( testing computation in grid programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.