Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"surface functionals in declarative programming" » "surface functionals in reactive programming" (Expand search), "surface functional in declarative programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalised in declarative programming" (Expand search), "surface functionality in declarative programming" (Expand search), "surface functions in declarative programming" (Expand search), "surface functional index declarative programming" (Expand search), "surface functionals on declarative programming" (Expand search), "surface functionals and declarative programming" (Expand search), "surface functionals of declarative programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"surface functionals in declarative programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( surface functionals in declarative programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("surface functionals in declarative programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.