Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"surface functionalities in text programming" » "surface functionalized in text programming" (Expand search), "surface functionality in text programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalization in text programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities of text programming" (Expand search), "surface functionals in text programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities in set programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities in textual programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities in context programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities in texts programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities in teeth programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"surface functionalities in text programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( surface functionalities in text programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("surface functionalities in text programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.