Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"reading metacognition using computational code" » "reading metacognitive using computational code" (Expand search), "reading cognition using computational code" (Expand search), "and metacognition using computational code" (Expand search), "reading recognition using computational code" (Expand search), "reading metacognition in computational code" (Expand search), "reading metacognition writing computational code" (Expand search), "reading metacognition and computational code" (Expand search), "reading metacognition using computational model" (Expand search), "reading metacognition using computational cost" (Expand search), "reading metacognition using computational models" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"reading metacognition using computational code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( reading metacognition using computational code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("reading metacognition using computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.