Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"modeling implication to precoder program" » "modeling application to precoder program" (Expand search), "modelling application to precoder program" (Expand search), "modeling applications to precoder program" (Expand search), "modeling implication to proder program" (Expand search), "modeling implication to recovery program" (Expand search), "modeling implication to precoce programa" (Expand search), "modeling implications to precoder program" (Expand search), "modeling implication of precoder program" (Expand search), "modeling implication to precedent program" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("modeling implication to precoder program") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"modeling implication to precoder program\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( modeling implication to precoder program ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.