Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"modeling implementation in routine programming" » "model implementation in routine programming" (Expand search), "guideline implementation in routine programming" (Expand search), "budgeting implementation in routine programming" (Expand search), "modeling implementation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "modeling implementation in cone programming" (Expand search), "modeling implementation in line programming" (Expand search), "modeling implementation and routine programming" (Expand search), "modeling implementation of routine programming" (Expand search), "modeling implementation _ routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("modeling implementation in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"modeling implementation in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( modeling implementation in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.