Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"model computational paths coverage in" » "models computational paths coverage in" (Expand search), "modelo computacional paths coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational paths coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational data coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational and coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational art coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational path coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational press coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational its coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational paths coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"model computational paths coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( model computational paths coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("model computational paths coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.