Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"learning function using octave programming" » "learning function using stage programming" (Expand search), "learning function using objective programming" (Expand search), "learning function using reactive programming" (Expand search), "learning functions using octave programming" (Expand search), "clearing function using octave programming" (Expand search), "learning fractions using octave programming" (Expand search), "learning function during octave programming" (Expand search), "learning reaction using octave programming" (Expand search), "learning function using octa programming" (Expand search), "learning function using octrees programming" (Expand search), "learning function using oct programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("learning function using octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"learning function using octave programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( learning function using octave programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.