Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"interface computing using octave programming" » "interface computer using octave programming" (Expand search), "interface coupling using octave programming" (Expand search), "interface coping using octave programming" (Expand search), "interface computing using stage programming" (Expand search), "interface computing using objective programming" (Expand search), "interface computing using reactive programming" (Expand search), "interface computing ufcg octave programming" (Expand search), "interface computing using octa programming" (Expand search), "interface computing using octrees programming" (Expand search), "interface computing using oct programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("interface computing using octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"interface computing using octave programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( interface computing using octave programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.