Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in communications using java programming" » "in communications in java programming" (Expand search), "in communications and java programming" (Expand search), "in communications plan java programming" (Expand search), "in communication using java programming" (Expand search), "line communications using java programming" (Expand search), "and communications using java programming" (Expand search), "in communications using and programming" (Expand search), "in communications using based programming" (Expand search), "in communications using goal programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("in communications using java programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"in communications using java programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( in communications using java programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.