Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"group computation in routine programming" » "group computation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "group computation in cone programming" (Expand search), "group computation in line programming" (Expand search), "group composition in routine programming" (Expand search), "group communication in routine programming" (Expand search), "group comparison in routine programming" (Expand search), "group computation and routine programming" (Expand search), "group computation of routine programming" (Expand search), "group imputation in routine programming" (Expand search), "group computation _ routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("group computation in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"group computation in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( group computation in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.