Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"fusion implementation in object programming" » "union implementation in object programming" (Expand search), "function implementation in object programming" (Expand search), "design implementation in object programming" (Expand search), "fusion implementation in subject programming" (Expand search), "fusion implementation in objective programming" (Expand search), "fusion implementation in content programming" (Expand search), "fusion implementation and object programming" (Expand search), "fusion implementation of object programming" (Expand search), "fusion implementation an object programming" (Expand search), "fusion implementation en object programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("fusion implementation in object programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"fusion implementation in object programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( fusion implementation in object programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.