Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"developing complex sampling coverage in" » "development complex sampling coverage in" (Expand search), "developing computer sampling coverage in" (Expand search), "developing company sampling coverage in" (Expand search), "developing complex mapping coverage in" (Expand search), "developing complex sampling adverse in" (Expand search), "developing complex sampling caveats in" (Expand search), "developing complex sampling coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"developing complex sampling coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( developing complex sampling coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("developing complex sampling coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.