Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding prediction and c programming" » "folding prediction and c programming" (Expand search), "modeling prediction and c programming" (Expand search), "reading prediction and c programming" (Expand search), "coding prediction in c programming" (Expand search), "coding prediction of c programming" (Expand search), "coding prediction _ c programming" (Expand search), "coding prediction and _ programming" (Expand search), "coding prediction and cone programming" (Expand search), "coding prediction and and programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding prediction and c programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding prediction and c programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding prediction and c programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.