Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding estimation in iterative programming" » "coding estimation in imperative programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation in generative programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation in literate programming" (Expand search), "loading estimation in iterative programming" (Expand search), "fading estimation in iterative programming" (Expand search), "modeling estimation in iterative programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation of iterative programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation an iterative programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation on iterative programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation in interactive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding estimation in iterative programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding estimation in iterative programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding estimation in iterative programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.