Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding detection using inductive programming" » "coding detection using disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using objective programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using reactive programming" (Expand search), "doping detection using inductive programming" (Expand search), "fading detection using inductive programming" (Expand search), "flooding detection using inductive programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using inductively programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using conductive programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using reductive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding detection using inductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding detection using inductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding detection using inductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.