Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding detection in routine programming" » "coding detection in reactive programming" (Expand search), "coding detection in cone programming" (Expand search), "coding detection in line programming" (Expand search), "doping detection in routine programming" (Expand search), "fading detection in routine programming" (Expand search), "flooding detection in routine programming" (Expand search), "coding detection and routine programming" (Expand search), "coding detection _ routine programming" (Expand search), "coding detection of routine programming" (Expand search)
"using in python python programming" » "using in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using in piton python programming" (Expand search), "using in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using _ python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding detection in routine programming\") OR (\"using in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding detection in routine programming ) OR ( using in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coding detection in routine programming") OR ("using in python python programming"))*.