Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding adaptation using conductive programming" » "coding adaptation using inductive programming" (Expand search), "coding adaptation using collective programming" (Expand search), "coding adaptation using objective programming" (Expand search), "coping adaptation using conductive programming" (Expand search), "codon adaptation using conductive programming" (Expand search), "coaching adaptation using conductive programming" (Expand search), "coding adaptation and conductive programming" (Expand search), "coding adaptation under conductive programming" (Expand search), "coding adaptation in conductive programming" (Expand search), "coding adaptation using reductive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding adaptation using conductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding adaptation using conductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding adaptation using conductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.