Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder worker's discourse java programming" » "coder workers discourse java programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse java programming" (Expand search), "coder women's discourse java programming" (Expand search), "coder worker's discourse and programming" (Expand search), "coder worker's discourse based programming" (Expand search), "coder worker's discourse goal programming" (Expand search), "recover worker's discourse java programming" (Expand search), "worker worker's discourse java programming" (Expand search), "older workers discourse java programming" (Expand search), "coder worker's discourse barra programming" (Expand search), "coder worker's discourse an programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder worker's discourse java programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder worker's discourse java programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder worker's discourse java programming ) OR ( on python python python programming ))*.