Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using patterns using description" » "coder using patterns nursing prescription" (Expand search), "coder using patterns imaging description" (Expand search), "coder using patterns and description" (Expand search), "coder using pattern using description" (Expand search), "coder cutting patterns using description" (Expand search), "coder eating patterns using description" (Expand search), "coder using patterns during description" (Expand search), "coder using patterns among description" (Expand search), "coders using patterns using description" (Expand search), "cover using patterns using description" (Expand search), "code using patterns using description" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using patterns using description\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using patterns using description ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using patterns using description") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.