Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using embedded linux programming" » "coder using embedded line programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedded linear programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedded lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder in embedded linux programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedded in programming" (Expand search), "coders using embedded linux programming" (Expand search), "cover using embedded linux programming" (Expand search), "code using embedded linux programming" (Expand search)
"api in python python programming" » "api in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api in piton python programming" (Expand search), "api in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api _ python python programming" (Expand search), "api an python python programming" (Expand search), "fpi in python python programming" (Expand search), "gpi in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using embedded linux programming\") OR (\"api in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using embedded linux programming ) OR ( api in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using embedded linux programming") OR ("api in python python programming"))*.