Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using coding based coverage" » "coder using coding based beverage" (Expand search), "coder using coding based beverages" (Expand search), "coder using coding and coverage" (Expand search), "coder using coping based coverage" (Expand search), "coder using coating based coverage" (Expand search), "coder using cooking based coverage" (Expand search), "coder using modeling based coverage" (Expand search), "coder using reading based coverage" (Expand search), "coders using coding based coverage" (Expand search), "cover using coding based coverage" (Expand search), "code using coding based coverage" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using coding based coverage\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using coding based coverage ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using coding based coverage") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.