Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using blocking c programming" » "coder using locking c programming" (Expand search), "coder swing blocking c programming" (Expand search), "coder using docking c programming" (Expand search), "coder using blocking _ programming" (Expand search), "coder using blocking cone programming" (Expand search), "coder using blocking and programming" (Expand search), "coders using blocking c programming" (Expand search), "cover using blocking c programming" (Expand search), "code using blocking c programming" (Expand search), "coder using blocking α programming" (Expand search), "coder using blocking p programming" (Expand search)
"python coding python python programming" » "python codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "action coding python python programming" (Expand search), "python code python python programming" (Expand search), "python codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "python using python python programming" (Expand search), "python coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "python coding pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using blocking c programming\") OR (\"python coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using blocking c programming ) OR ( python coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using blocking c programming") OR ("python coding python python programming"))*.