Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder solution using log programables" » "coder solution using logic programable" (Expand search), "coder solution using logicos programables" (Expand search), "coder solution using logico programable" (Expand search), "code solution using log programables" (Expand search), "copper solution using log programables" (Expand search), "powder solution using log programables" (Expand search), "coder solution using long programables" (Expand search), "coder solution using low programables" (Expand search), "coder solution using lhc programables" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder solution using log programables\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder solution using log programables ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder solution using log programables") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.