Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder properties predict coding program" » "coder properties prediction coding program" (Expand search), "coder properties produced coding program" (Expand search), "coder properties physico coding program" (Expand search), "code properties predict coding program" (Expand search), "powder properties predict coding program" (Expand search), "folder properties predict coding program" (Expand search), "coder properties predict coping program" (Expand search), "coder properties predictive coding program" (Expand search), "coder properties predict cloning program" (Expand search), "coder properties predict loading program" (Expand search), "coder properties predict cooling programs" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder properties predict coding program\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder properties predict coding program ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder properties predict coding program") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.