Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder processing making algorithm parallelization" » "coder processing making automatic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder processing imaging algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder processing aging algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder processing main algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "cider processing making algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "powder processing making algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "power processing making algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder processing making algorithms parallelization" (Expand search), "coder processing mapping algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder processing ranking algorithm parallelization" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder processing making algorithm parallelization\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder processing making algorithm parallelization ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder processing making algorithm parallelization") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.