Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder modern coding data type" » "coder modern housing data type" (Expand search), "coder modern code data type" (Expand search), "coder modern china data type" (Expand search), "powder modern coding data type" (Expand search), "code moderne coding data type" (Expand search), "under modern coding data type" (Expand search), "coder modern encoding data type" (Expand search), "coder modern closing data type" (Expand search), "coder modern coding dna type" (Expand search), "coder modern coding data types" (Expand search), "coder modern coding data the" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder modern coding data type\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder modern coding data type ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder modern coding data type") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.