Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder lovers's discourse reactive programming" » "coder lovers's discourse objective programming" (Expand search), "coder lovers's discourse teaching programming" (Expand search), "coder lovers's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder women's discourse reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder other's discourse reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder lovers's discourse practice programming" (Expand search), "coder lovers's discourse practices programming" (Expand search), "coder lovers's discourse narrative programming" (Expand search), "poder lovers's discourse reactive programming" (Expand search), "codes lovers's discourse reactive programming" (Expand search), "coded lovers's discourse reactive programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder lovers's discourse reactive programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder lovers's discourse reactive programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder lovers's discourse reactive programming ) OR ( on python python python programming ))*.