Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder lover's discourse declarative programming" » "coder lover's discourse reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse deliberative programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse comparative programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse demonstrative programming" (Expand search), "poder lover's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "codes lover's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "coded lover's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder lovers's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder cover's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder mover's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder lover's discourse declarative programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder lover's discourse declarative programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder lover's discourse declarative programming ) OR ( on python python python programming ))*.