Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder isolate using samples on" » "modern isolate using samples on" (Expand search), "lodder isolated using samples on" (Expand search), "rodent isolate using samples on" (Expand search), "coder isolates using samples on" (Expand search), "coder isolates causing samples on" (Expand search), "coder isolated during samples on" (Expand search), "coder isolate using simple on" (Expand search), "coder isolate using simplex on" (Expand search), "coder isolate cutting samples on" (Expand search), "coder isolate using samples of" (Expand search), "coder isolate using samples in" (Expand search), "coder isolate using samples and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder isolate using samples on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder isolate using samples on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder isolate using samples on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.