Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder in embedded coder program" » "coder in embedded copper program" (Expand search), "coder in embedded model program" (Expand search), "coder in embedded power program" (Expand search), "coder in embedded cooper program" (Expand search), "coder in embedded proder program" (Expand search), "coder in embedded closer program" (Expand search), "coder an embedded coder program" (Expand search), "coder of embedded coder program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded coder program" (Expand search), "code in embedded coder program" (Expand search), "codes in embedded coder program" (Expand search), "poder in embedded coder program" (Expand search)
"using coupled python python programming" » "using coupled method python programming" (Expand search), "using coupled position python programming" (Expand search), "in coupled python python programming" (Expand search), "using coupled pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coupled piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coupled pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder in embedded coder program") OR ("using coupled python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in embedded coder program\") OR (\"using coupled python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in embedded coder program ) OR ( using coupled python python programming ))*.